No Damage, Only Drama: Pakistan’s Airstrike Claims on India Proven Fake

New Delhi: Pakistan’s high-octane propaganda campaign following Operation Sindoor has come crashing down — thanks to cold, hard satellite evidence. In a damning revelation, renowned satellite imagery analyst Damien Symon has debunked Islamabad’s claims of successfully striking multiple Indian military installations.

From Sukhois to S-400s, Pakistan boasted of direct hits and destruction. But as Symon’s forensic analysis reveals — not a single one of those claims holds water.

🔍Claim 1: Sukhoi Fighter Jet Hit at Adampur Airbase

Pakistani sources shared a grainy image showing a supposed burn mark near a jet, claiming it was a Sukhoi-30MKI hit at Adampur in Punjab. Symon, however, confirmed that:

  • The image pre-dates the conflict

  • The jet is not a Sukhoi but a MiG-29 undergoing routine maintenance

  • The mark was engine soot, not bomb damage

Verdict: Completely False

 

🔍 Claim 2: S-400 System Destroyed at Bhuj Airbase

Another dramatic claim said India’s prized S-400 missile defense system was hit at the Bhuj airbase. Shared images showed dark patches on the ground, touted as missile impact zones.

Symon clarified that:

  • The patches were actually oil stains in a vehicle yard

  • The image was taken before the conflict began

Verdict: Misleading and Pre-dated

 

🔍 Claim 3: Srinagar Airport Attacked

To back its narrative of wide-scale damage, Pakistan circulated a blurry image of Srinagar airport. High-resolution satellite imagery, however, showed:

  • No visible impact

  • The civilian apron and surroundings were intact

Verdict: No Strike, No Damage

🔍 Claim 4: Missile Strike at Jammu Airport

Another viral claim showed dark spots near Jammu airport’s runway. Symon’s review confirmed:

  • The image was digitally manipulated

  • Post-strike satellite photos showed no actual damage

Verdict: Doctored Evidence

🔍 Claim 5: Naliya Airbase Bombed

Pakistan pointed to a supposed strike at Naliya airbase, based on a photo showing scorched ground. But once again, Symon’s analysis revealed:

  • The dark patch was a cloud shadow over the runway

  • No bomb or missile impact detected

Verdict: Natural Shadow, Not Bombing

🛰️ Even Chinese Imagery Didn’t Back Pakistan’s Story

Pakistan tried to cite imagery from a Chinese satellite company to prove damage at Adampur. But the alleged “blast mark” had already appeared in older, unrelated imagery — proving it was not the result of any strike.

Verdict: Misuse of Outdated Data

🔚 Conclusion: Propaganda vs Proof

With each claim falling apart under satellite scrutiny, Damien Symon’s analysis makes it clear:
Pakistan’s narrative was built on fiction, not fact. The attempt to fabricate damage through doctored images and pre-conflict visuals is now exposed, leaving Islamabad’s credibility in tatters.

India’s military infrastructure remains untouched and alert — and the truth is finally orbiting above the lies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *