‘Why Should Iran Have None If Others Have?’ Trump Backs Limited Iranian Missile Capability

‘Why Should Iran Have None If Others Have?’ Trump Backs Limited Iranian Missile Capability

 

News Desk: US President Donald Trump has signaled a major shift in Washington’s approach toward Iran, suggesting that Tehran could be allowed to retain a limited ballistic missile capability as part of an emerging post-conflict arrangement.

Speaking on the sidelines of the G7 Summit in France, Trump argued that it would be difficult to justify stripping Iran of missile capabilities while other countries in the Middle East continue to maintain similar arsenals. The remarks mark a notable departure from years of US policy that sought severe restrictions on Tehran’s missile programme.

Trump’s comments come amid ongoing efforts to consolidate a fragile ceasefire between the United States and Iran following months of military confrontation that rattled the region and threatened global energy supplies.

Drawing a distinction between ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons, the US President suggested that future negotiations should focus on preventing nuclear proliferation while addressing conventional weapons within a broader regional security framework. His remarks indicate that Washington may be willing to pursue a more pragmatic approach in exchange for long-term stability.

The shift is particularly significant because Iran’s missile programme has long been one of the central points of contention between Tehran and Washington. Previous US administrations repeatedly demanded strict curbs on Iran’s missile arsenal, describing it as a threat to regional security and American allies.

While opening the door to limited missile retention, Trump stressed that the United States would continue to maintain a strong military presence in the Gulf and closely monitor Iran’s compliance with any future agreement. He warned that Washington would not hesitate to respond if Tehran violated ceasefire commitments or resumed activities deemed threatening.

The remarks have already sparked debate among foreign policy analysts. Supporters view the proposal as a realistic path toward reducing tensions and preventing another costly conflict in the Middle East. Critics, however, argue that allowing Iran to keep any ballistic missile capability could weaken deterrence efforts and embolden the Islamic Republic.

Negotiators from both sides are expected to continue discussions on Iran’s nuclear activities, regional influence, and missile programme in the coming weeks. The outcome of those talks could shape a new security architecture for the Middle East and redefine US-Iran relations after years of hostility.

Trump’s latest comments suggest that Washington’s priority may be shifting from dismantling Iran’s military capabilities altogether to managing them through diplomacy—a move that could have far-reaching consequences across the region.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *